The Question of Loyalty by Mitsuye Yamada Free Essay Example, 2250 words

The poem The Question of Loyalty by Mitsuye Yamada discusses the emotions and reactions of a time in American history where the loyalty and honor of the Japanese people are questioned. In creating this distrust, the Japanese people were put into a position to choose between the loyalties to their families and history and that of their present relationships in their new homeland, America. The poem shows how she received the events as a young adult having spent most of her life in the United States, but also provides context for how she is now perceived by the population of her new homeland, a homeland to which she is not actually new. It affects her mother profoundly, but she only sits back as events unfold as they have only a cursory meaning. She is arbitrary in how she feels about the events. As such, she presents her story in a few words filled with embittered irony. The last line of the poem The Question of Loyalty by Mitsuye Yamada states I signed my only ticket out (Patterso n 198). This reveals how she has come to understand that she is being asked to sign away her identity in exchange for her freedom. We will write a custom essay sample on The Question of Loyalty by Mitsuye Yamada or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/page She has given in to the pressures of the American people to assure them that she was not covertly conspiring against them. Even in this act of courage and loyalty to the American people, she knows that she has sold out her own heritage, giving this signature with the understanding that in doing so she was renouncing her loyalty to the Japanese people.

The Safety Plan For Fran And Her Son - 1361 Words

The first safety plan option could help Fran by stopping an argument from occurring if she knows what triggers Bobby. The second option allows Fran to get away from any objects that Bobby could use as weapons to hurt her. The third option helps Fran because if anything were to happen she would have someone to help her stop Bobby or a witness to what has happen. The fourth options helps Fran by being able to run to any payphone and call people that she knows could help her. The fifth option allows Fran to know what way to run if she is running away from Bobby without coming to a dead end. The sixth options allow Fran to leave the house without worrying of leaving anything behind because everything she needs is in the emergency bag. The†¦show more content†¦A safety plan is an essential tool for people to use to assist women or men in domestic violence relationships. A safety plan helps explore and map out options and ideas to promote safety when domestic violence or family vi olence has occurred. This could prevent careless actions from happening such as not knowing where to go, or becoming the aggressor. Taking these precaution can help save the lives of women or men in an event of a violent episode of rage or frustration. It is important for the victim to strategize what are their alternatives and identify triggers of what causes the violence, in order to prevent it from happening. A safety plan needs to be tailored to the individual needs and should promote safety at any moment of altercation. A safety plan encourages building a trustworthy relationship that may help the victim coupe with the situation by exchanging thoughts and ideas. This relationship is an essential resource for the victim, as violence could happen at any time. A safety plan could encourage many women to finally get the boldness to leave their partners, but there are certain resource women need to be successful. In the novel â€Å"Black and Blue† Frannie Benedetto suffered h orrible abuse by her police officer husband, Bobby. Frannie finally get the valor to leave him when she realizes that her abuse will never stop, no matter how good she is to her husband. Fran decide to runaway with her son Robert. She takes on the identity of someone

Contract and Professor Knox Group Free Essays

SOPHIA HENRY WEEK TWO ASSIGNMENT ETHICS: PROFESSOR KNOX GROUP A A newspaper columnist signs a contract with a newspaper chain. Several months later she is offered a position with another newspaper chain at a higher salary. Because she would prefer making more money she notifies the first chain that she is breaking her contract. We will write a custom essay sample on Contract and Professor Knox Group or any similar topic only for you Order Now The court will decide the legality of her action. But what is the morality? Did she the columnist behave ethically? An airline pilot goes for his regular medical checkup. The doctor discovers that he has developed a heart murmur. The pilot only has one month to go before his retirement. The doctor wonders whether, under these unusual circumstances she is justified in withholding the information about the pilot’s condition. (1) An employment contract is a contractual relationship between an employer and an individual employee or organization. My first issue at hand is the terms under which the contract was signed. The court has to determine whether it was stated on the contract that the columnist was locked in until the term were fulfilled under which she would be ethically wrong to break that contract. If an employee willingly breaks the terms of their contract it is unethical behavior and should be held accountable for those actions. Understandably the columnist has researched and came across a better opportunity which is financially gainful to her but she also had to explore the ramifications for accepting their offer of employment as it was presented to her. Consideration had to be taken by the columnist that time and money was spent on recruiting her for the job and ensuring that she was settled in a comfortable environment to conduct her duties accordingly and up to company standards. On the other hand it is not immoral to break a contract to pursue better opportunity for oneself if the term of the contract does not state that she had to serve for a certain period of time before leaving. Immorality would come into play if she willingly and knowingly ignores the terms and sought out other employment opportunities while being employed under that agreement. If she knowing breaks the terms of the agreement she would be legally responsible for repaying the recruitment fees and all money spent by the employer to ensure that she was situated at her position as well as all fees for recruiting someone else to replace her. I believe that the columnist was wrong to enter into a contractual agreement if her job search was not over and that if she really wanted the job she should have been honest with the employer and discuss not getting into a contractual position at the company while she pursues better pay and opportunity. The columnist was guided by her mind and conscience to do what was best for her at the time and was not thinking long term or the ramifications to the company if she decided to leave her contract early. I think both Augustine and Aquinos would commend her for following her virtue and doing what is right for her as an individual. Aquinos believes that we all have to find something in practical reasoning that will help us come to the best conclusion for ones self and that is what the columnist did, her one big reason was that she wanted to make more money and that was her drive for getting out of her contract early. (2) There is no reason to justify withholding anyone’s medical diagnosis form them, it is not justified morally and ethically. It is unethical and immoral especially from a doctor’s standpoint because his/her oath is to protect and treat no matter what the circumstances are and not honoring that oath in my opinion is an evil act. The pilot can still perform his duties until retirement under close doctor supervision and with the help of medication to control his symptoms. I do not think that his diagnosis should impact his retirement benefits as he is suffering for a condition that is beyond his control and not of his own doing. The physician’s only concern at this point is find ways in keeping the pilot healthy, provide him with enough information on his diagnosis and ease his mind from the worries he might have. Neither Augustine nor Aquinos would agree with the path the doctor is thinking of taking with the pilot. One is the reasons is because the news does not affect him personally nor is his virtue at stack. Though the doctor is trying to do a good deed and allow the pilot to enjoy the few weeks before his retirement stress and worry free he is also doing him a disservice by not giving him the option to make the choice of whether he wants to retire now or try to continue with his journey and retire at his scheduled time. Ethically the doctor has to follow the law and relay any findings and diagnosis to the pilot so he can come to terms in dealing with the symptoms and treatment of his diagnosis. How to cite Contract and Professor Knox Group, Papers